/int/ - International

For French friends around the world

Mode: Reply

Max message length: 20000


Max file size: 48.00 MB

Max files: 3


(used to delete files and postings)


FrChan /int/ is an international community to discuss about France or any other topics.

[Index] [Catalog] [Down] [Refresh]

Why circumcision is bad Anonymous 02/22/2021 (Mon) 14:13:57 No. 2768
Circumcision decreases penile sensitivity http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102?dopt=Abstract Circumcision associated with sexual difficulties http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 Circumcision linked to alexithymia http://www.mensstudies.com/content/2772r13175400432/?p=a7068101fbdd48819f10dd04dc1e19fb&pi=4 The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/798.abstract Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence http://www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf There is no case for the widespread implementation of circumcision as a preventative measure to stop transmission of AIDS/HIV http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00761.x/full Circumcision decreases sexual pleasure http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977 Circumcision decreases efficiency of nerve response in the glans of the penis http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 Circumcision policy is influenced by psychosocial factors rather than alleged health benefits http://www.circumcision.org/policy.htm Circumcision linked to pain, trauma, and psychosexual sequelae http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/boyle6/ Circumcision results in significant loss of erogenous tissue http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8800902 Circumcision has negligible benefit http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9091693 Neonatal circumcision linked to pain and trauma http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731 Circumcision may lead to need for increased care and medical attention in the first 3 years of life http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9393302 Circumcision linked to psychological trauma http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/goldman1/ Circumcision may lead to abnormal brain development and subsequent deviations in behavior http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10657682 Circumcision reduces marital intimacy and increases risky behavior. http://www.cirp.org/library/general/hughes/ http://archive.is/cJFaC Foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 http://archive.is/7vlut >The glans of the uncircumcised men had significantly lower mean (sem) pressure thresholds than that of the circumcised men, at 0.161 (0.078) g (P = 0.040) when controlled for age, location of measurement, type of underwear worn, and ethnicity. There were significant differences in pressure thresholds by location on the penis (P < 0.001). The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis was the circumcision scar on the ventral surface. Five locations on the uncircumcised penis that are routinely removed at circumcision had lower pressure thresholds than the ventral scar of the circumcised penis. Uncircumcised men please wives better, have fewer sexual partners, more frequent sex, the same level of dysfunction, https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163 http://archive.is/iXRLG Criticism of circumcision reporting https://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-earp/does-circumcision-reduce-_b_9743242.html http://archive.is/oumy6 Circumcision doesn’t really reduce STD rates. The difference is either insignificant or more so for the circumcised, especially for the very promiscuous. Circumcised men engage in more unusual sexual practices. http://www.cirp.org/library/general/laumann/ http://archive.is/ybRH Adult circumcision reduces sensitivity twice as much as it improves satisfaction according to self-reporting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956453 http://archive.is/uHpoR >The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/798.abstract >Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence http://www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf There is simply no defense for genital mutilation and it needs to be completely illegal if done for anything other than a legitimate medical reason. The foreskin has more nerve endings than a clit does and is packed with dendritic cells that absorb particles around them to identify and present any threat to the immune system which lowers your risk of an STD. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033703/ Those same cells also absorb them sweet pussy juices full of them sweet pussy hormones that trigger primal urges in your cave man brain that make you think "i need to protect this one" and at the same time your glans are releasing their own hormones that trigger primal urges in her cave woman brain that make her think "i need to be loyal to this one" which probably explains the high rate of divorce, cheating and domestic violence in countries like America which have a high rate of genital mutilation. You also risk damaging the hymen which no, the hymen breaking during sex IS NOT NORMAL and 60% of women still have an intact hymen, those without have had theirs ripped to shreds by mutilated penises and that is not normal. Don't know much about the hymen? Here you go watch a video that is shown in sex ed classes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ikXim4wevc Now you are probably angry, Is there good news you are asking? Yes there is, you can take steps to regain some of if not most of the normal function of your penis. https://www.healthline.com/health/mens-health/foreskin-restoration http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/greer1/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255154/

[Index] [Catalog] [Top]

no cookies?